Skip to main content

IMRaD

IMRaD differs from the usual argument based papers because its more of an experiment based paper. In an IMRaD paper you need the number of participants in your study, procedures, and results.  With argumentative papers you usually just need sources to support you argument.

The main points for an IMRaD paper is the intro, methods, results, and discussion. This differs a lot from a argumentitve paper because in in argumentative paper you just need headings and to support the argument you are trying to make.  An IMRaD paper also is more of an explanation of your findings and explaining the results.

The set up of the paper is also different between and IMRaD paper and an argumentative paper.  For an IMRaD paper it is set up with separate paragraphs dependent on the intro methods results and discussion.  Argumentative papers are set up with titles you come up with yourself and your explain your sources or argument relating to the title.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Survery and synthesis chart

                                     Authors Name Academic performance dependent on eating breakfast What is defined as breakfast What percentage of teenagers eat breakfast Other Info Gr                     Gregory W. Phillips  https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876514.pdf “The data revealed that 65.5 percent self identified they had eaten some type of breakfast. Of those that had eaten breakfast, 72.7 received a “C” or better on the test.” “ During the course of the study 188 students made an “A” on the second exam, this includes 17.7% of the students who had eaten breakfast and 9.7% of those who had not eaten breakfast.”  Following the premise of the American Dietetic Association (1996) that breakfast is when you eat, not what you eat, the administrator of the exam explained that breakfast could be a Pop Tar...
2 comments
Read more

Strengths and Weaknesses

The Role of Writing in Political Science Strengths: 1) Different paragraphs for Academic/nonacademic sources.  2) used SLR 3) sites sources correctly Weaknesses: 1) very repetitive 2) not much information from the interview 3) There was not a big explanation after quotes Writing in Psychology Strengths: 1)interviews 2 people. 2)some  explanations  after quotes 3) sited sources (even if not in correct format) Weaknesses: 1) incorrect font. 2) no cover page. 3)not enough pages/sources Writing as a Creative Writer Strengths: 1) separated academic/nonacademic sources 2) had sub-subtitles so you knew what they were talking about 3) well written explanations Weaknesses: 1) used quotes in the conclusion 2) pages numbered wrong 3) sub-subtitles not centered Writing in the Field of Economics Strengths: sources cites correctly 2) organized fairly well 3) conclusion wraps up the paper well Weaknesses: 1) Wrong font 2) first few paragra...
Post a Comment
Read more