Skip to main content

Reflection of my paper from peer reviews

After giving feedback to my peers I realized that I could use some of the feedback myself.  For example, for both of my peers papers I told the to check the in-text citations.  After talking to Mr. Paudel I realized my in-text citations were also wrong.  The correct way for an in-text citation is (last name, year, p.) after realizing this I fixed my own paper.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Survery and synthesis chart

                                     Authors Name Academic performance dependent on eating breakfast What is defined as breakfast What percentage of teenagers eat breakfast Other Info Gr                     Gregory W. Phillips  https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876514.pdf “The data revealed that 65.5 percent self identified they had eaten some type of breakfast. Of those that had eaten breakfast, 72.7 received a “C” or better on the test.” “ During the course of the study 188 students made an “A” on the second exam, this includes 17.7% of the students who had eaten breakfast and 9.7% of those who had not eaten breakfast.”  Following the premise of the American Dietetic Association (1996) that breakfast is when you eat, not what you eat, the administrator of the exam explained that breakfast could be a Pop Tar...
2 comments
Read more

Strengths and Weaknesses

The Role of Writing in Political Science Strengths: 1) Different paragraphs for Academic/nonacademic sources.  2) used SLR 3) sites sources correctly Weaknesses: 1) very repetitive 2) not much information from the interview 3) There was not a big explanation after quotes Writing in Psychology Strengths: 1)interviews 2 people. 2)some  explanations  after quotes 3) sited sources (even if not in correct format) Weaknesses: 1) incorrect font. 2) no cover page. 3)not enough pages/sources Writing as a Creative Writer Strengths: 1) separated academic/nonacademic sources 2) had sub-subtitles so you knew what they were talking about 3) well written explanations Weaknesses: 1) used quotes in the conclusion 2) pages numbered wrong 3) sub-subtitles not centered Writing in the Field of Economics Strengths: sources cites correctly 2) organized fairly well 3) conclusion wraps up the paper well Weaknesses: 1) Wrong font 2) first few paragra...
Post a Comment
Read more